About Me

Name: PDX Dave
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

ObaMARS Attacks! "Don't Run. We Are Your Friends."

Martian Translator Device: (While disintegrating fleeing humans with death rays) Don't run! We are your friends!
Martian Translator Device: (Continuing to vaporize fleeing humans) We come in peace! We come in peace!

President Obooba: (Preparing to nationalize medicine) Don't run! We won't nationalize medicine!
President Obooba: (Continuing to nationalize medicine) Cooperate with us! We won't nationalize medicine!


White House: No Push For 'Public Option'

While Obama believes a gov't-run health care would best meet his reform goals, aides say he's not demanding it....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Socialized Restaurants

In the land of Eats, there is a street with a dozen or more restaurants. It's called Restaurant Street. Most of them are state-run restaurants that provide subsidized food at a much lower cost. Only one restaurant is not subsidized, and it happens to be the best restaurant on the block.

The menus in the government restaurants feature items dictated by the government. The cooks in the government restaurants are government cooks, who are not allowed to cook their own culinary specials, but must serve exactly what is proscribed by the Minister of Menus.  Which raises the question of why they are called "cooks" at all, rather than automatons which they resemble most. Sadly for the cooks who loved the art of cooking, their hands were tied. If a cook catered to an individual customer's desire and deviated from the government recipe, he would face fines, loss of his job, or even imprisonment by the government.

Not surprisingly, the food in the government restaurants is carefully designed to "not offend" as many pallets as possible and thus was pretty bland. That is to say, it is not intended to actually taste good, but to not taste specifically bad.  Many of the diners at the government restaurants are forced by law to eat the food there, and they didn't know that food was supposed to taste good.

At the government restaurants, breakfast would regularly be delayed until lunch, and many times until dinnertime. Diners who came in at 6:00 am on Monday and ordered eggs over easy might wait until Tuesday evening for a breakfast of cold porridge. But it was free at the government restaurant!

At the lone restaurant that was not government run, called the Free Market Restaurant, happy customers came and went at a regular clip. The food at the Free Market Restaurant was a bit more expensive, but they could get it exactly like they WANTED it, and served quickly by a polite wait person rather than a surly government bureaucrat. If a person were extremely poor, they would also be served nutritious food for free. They wouldn't be served filet mignon for free, but they would leave with a full belly, which is perfectly fair. In this case, there IS a free lunch, but it maybe wasn't quite as tasty as the $50 lunch. Who would reasonably expect otherwise?

A few miles from Restaurant Street is a government agency who's job it is to rank and grade all the restaurants. Not surprisingly, the government bureaucrats there find the fare at the government restaurants to be of the BEST quality, and the Free Market restaurant to be horrifically unsatisfactory. They regularly complain about the Free Market restaurant not serving their entire menu for free, and their grading system heavily penalized them for that. Any restaurant that served free food was automatically deemed "better" than the Free Market Restaurant. The actual quality of the food was immaterial. That is be served free was the most important factor.

But, the customers of all the restaurants knew in their heart of hearts where the best food was to be served. Only one restaurant had a steady flow of customers from the OTHER restaurants. Only one restaurant had a creative and tasty menu from which the others were always trying to copy and steal.

The people who ran the government restaurants – indeed, the very ones who came up with the IDEA of government restaurants – were very mad at the Free Market Restaurant. It made THEIR restaurants look bad. For, even though they claimed they were the best, everyone knew otherwise. So, they wanted to create a law to "reform" the Free Market Restaurant by turning it into a government-run restaurant. They called the Free Market Restaurant nasty names, and accused them of wanting to starve little children to death, even though the Free Market Restaurant fed more poor little children for free than anyone else.

Most of the customers of the Free Market Restaurant were understandably very upset by the plan to turn their restaurant into a government restaurant. They liked their food as it was. They liked the service. They liked how quickly they were served.

The poor customers of the Free Market restaurant thought it was a grand idea. They thought they would get Boef Bourguignion for free. They didn't know that the best food would be taken off the menu and NOBODY would get it, and everyone in the Free Market Restaurant would be stuck with bland food served by surly bureaucrats after a long wait, and they would change the name to "The Best Restaurant in Town."

So giddy were the fans of government-run everything, that they gave those who thought up the idea of destroying the Free Market Restaurant a Nobel Peace Prize just for thinking of it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wait One Cotton Pickin Second Here!

Reality check!

Rewind a few months to the heyday of the left's delusion that they could shove every aspect of their Health Care wish list down the collective throat of Americans. Single payer, forced subscription, government control, swastikas on nurse uniforms...... OK, the last one was a logical result, not a wish.....

Now, fast forward to today. The health insurance industry says they can't support Max Baucus' health bill because it DOES NOT have a key element on the left's wish list: Forced subscription.  The reaction of the left SHOULD BE to say, "Right on brother!" and build a campfire around which to sing kum-by-ya with America's Health Insurance Plans, the group which wants to see fascistic orders of compliance.

But the reaction, instead, is anger and accusations that the group is trying to "torpedo" health insurance reform.  Huh?

Let's get this straight: America's Health Insurance Plans starts out agreeing with the left on forced subscription. America's Health Insurance Plans does not waiver on that as Democrats drop the requirement for expediency. Now, the left is pretending that THEY NEVER supported forced compliance, and that America's Health Insurance Plans are evil racist thugs trying to make babies die for doing so.

Now, here is what makes me scratch my head in wonderment: Not one mainstream media source will point this obvious fact out. If Republicans did a flip-flop like that, the media would have banner headlines in red ink trumpeting it as proof of incompetence and evil intentions. But such a glaring inconsistency from the left is virtually ignored.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

After Socialized Medicine Kills Ya....

Here is what awaits your corpse after the state decided you aren't a viable life form, and demands you submit to euthanasia:

Left to Rot in the Morgue

The Socialist enclave of Detroit is stacking corpses like cord wood as it demonstrates - yet again - that government does everything worse than a retarded third grader could.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Die Quickly: Pot Calls Cotton Ball Black

If anyone could be labeled as having a "die quickly" agenda toward the sick, it would be the proponents of government-run health care.

In Oregon, we have government-run health care for elderly and disabled citizens who don't have insurance. We also have the nation's first euthanasia law.

The combination of these two liberal heartthrob policies is the repeated refusal of the state to treat terminal patients. After all, spending money on the "terminally ill" is seen as wasting good money on a selfish person who refuses to do the right thing and JUST DIE. So, they give them a none-too-subtle nudge in the "right" direction by refusing treatment and offering euthanasia to end their worthless life.

Plainly such a policy says with clarity, "Just crawl off and die like a good citizen."

Once again, Democrats have their finger on the pulse of what would outrage the American electorate. Problem is, it is THEIR policies which are outrageous, yet they accuse Republicans of the VERY outrage which is theirs.

"Die Quickly" is a deplorable government policy, and exactly what we will get under government-run health care.

Ask yourself how many times a cancer patient has been described as having no chance of recovery by their doctors, only to prove them all wrong with a "miraculous" recovery? Well, the Socialist Republic of Oregon does not believe in miracles, let alone miraculous recoveries. Once a patient is deemed to have a small chance of survival, treatment is yanked faster than a Chicago politician can say, "Trust me."

Die quickly, indeed. We can only hope these government health care schemes die quickly.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shame on Sarah Palin

or
No, Sarah, There Are No Oregon Death Panels Either

For those who will argue that the "death panel" scenario is a figment of Sarah Palin's imagination, please google "Oregon +Euthanasia +Cancer" and variations thereon.

In Oregon, the government health insurance is reticent  treat the terminally ill. They will, however, go out of their way to let the terminal ill know that they WILL pay for euthanasia.

Oregon has no "Death Panel" as such. There is not a LAW that says, "Those labeled  terminally ill must die if it isn't financially viable to treat them." What there is in the Oregon public health care option, is EXACTLY WHAT THERE WILL BE under ObamaCare: The bureaucratic ability of ObamaCare administrators to "make policy" in administering the program.

No Death Panels. WORSE THAN THAT: "Death Policies" which cannot be argued with, reasoned with, or appealed to. Mindless bureaucrats and computers issuing "decisions" based on policy and labels. No guilt. No panels. Are your "chances of survival" less than 5%?  Death to you. "Sorry, it's not personal that we want you to die... it's just fiscal policy. Our hands are tied. Have a nice day."

So, when they say there are no "death panels" in the proposed national health insurance law, they are being honest. Yes, Sarah is wrong. Shame on her.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »