About Me

Name: PDX Dave
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Obamao Finally HAS IT!!!!

Obamao has the excuse he's been looking for to surrender in Afghanistan!

They did it in Vietnam, and they have yearned for a repeat ever since: American military defeat.

Since Karzai has refused to accept the popular world press verdict that the Afghan election was rigged (and no reasonable person could blame him, given their propensity to make crap up and believe the most transparent lies), Obamao has declared that he won't "make a decision" about troops until Karzai admits to crimes he insists he didn't commit, and submit to an unconstitutional "run-off" election.

Now, Obamao has the reason he has so desperately looked for to surrender in Afghanistan: The media has declared Karzai a fraud.

Whew!!! That was a close one. Obama almost had to live up to his pledge to WIN in Afghanistan.  I'm sure the very THOUGHT gave him indigestion!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Surrender Monkeys Prepping White Flag

Democrats and the child-in-chief appear to be ironing out the white flag in preparation for a Vietnam-esque surrender in Afghanistan.

You can almost hear throat misters spritzing across the capitol as the chorus of spineless surrender builds to a crescendo: "Unwinnable."

"Unwinnable" is liberalspeak for, "Let's surrender because after all we're the bad guys and they are the innocent victims in all this."

Democrats are just PRAYING that a village full of crippled children gets bombed soon (and hopefully caught on video)Then they will have proof positive to show on the six o'clock news that our soldiers are murdering beasts on a bloodthirsty rampage across that colorful and exotic land.

Look for the language of defeat and surrender to be refined and parroted more and more in the coming weeks. Watch other defeatist terms to be batted about like a badminton birdie as their game of defeat picks up steam.

Obama wants desperately to surrender. He ACHES to surrender. But a nasty little thing called RE-ELECTION is making him hesitate. Rest assured that his hesitation will be overcome by the latent liberal tendency to embrace the enemy.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vietnam Redux

Democrats love the Vietnam war because they won and America lost.

They hate Iraq because we won despite their best efforts on behalf of the enemy, and they want to make damn good and sure we lose in Afghanistan.

Is the child-in-chief, Presidentito Obama, deliberately delaying a request made a LONG TIME AGO by the commanders in the field for more troops? Of course he is. He - and the Democrats - are hoping against hope that something dramatic will happen between now and then. Something to give them the excuse to declare Afghanistan "unwinnable" and precipitously surrender.

Just like they did in Vietnam.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (18) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Fiddles While Afghanistan Burns

Nero had nothing on Obama.

So out of touch is our child-in-chief that he is sojourning around Europe pimping Chicago for a series of GAMES while Afghanistan turns into burning rubble.

To be fair, it is totally logical that Afghanistan would become the next focus of Al Qaeda's wrath after they were tossed unceremoniously from Iraq by President Bush. Even if "W" were still in office, the war in Afghanistan would have ratcheted to a higher level because Osama's bomb vest boys have been denied a major venue, but their show must go on somewhere.

It's called a New World War, where an amorphous, ununiformed enemy appears and disappears from conflict zones as they are allowed. This is not to say that making war on them is pointless. Far from it. The narrower their field of play, the more ineffective they are globally.

So, Obama is not at fault for the heightened conflict in  Afghanistan, but he IS at fault for running the war with more brooding thumb sucking than bold action. FDR he ain't. At least FDR had the cajones to act, even though many of his actions turned out to be disastrous mistakes. Obama lacks the nerve, experience, and foresight to make any bold wartime decisions.  Athis heart, he has no stomach for war, and if it weren't for a nasty thing called "re-election," he would declare Afghanistan "unwinnable" and precipitously surrender just like the Democrarts did in Vietnam.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »